Strakeln wrote on Dec 14
th, 2013 at 10:02am:
I'm torn on the issue. I feel they definitely qualify as the definition of "NSFW" that we've long used - it's not about how any members feel about the pictures, it's about how the people looking over the shoulders of members feel about the pictures. Like it or not, there's always some prude in offices who will complain about an image of someone in various states of undress.
But on the other hand, I really like the titties, and we've long been tolerant of them in signatures. I pretty much consider this site NSFW altogether - I wouldn't surf it at my workplace, and they block it anyway.
Since I'm torn on which direction to go, I am going to put the issue up to a hopelessly corrupt democracy. A poll will be going up, and there will be no voter registration.
I'm of a mind that if there is a user here that cannot/does not want to deploy some kind of a script filtering solution, just ask the poster with the offending image to remove it.
I will certainly take out the ones I have that are deemed over the line. I've been too long in the workforce to be a shitstain about this sort of thing. I, too, do not browse here at work. But, I have consideration for those that do.
So, tell me what to do, chief (or those that are concerned about objectionable content).