Quote:Oh this You just want the exploit tactic is priceless, I mean really, spare me because it is the lamest of all Ollie and Cos excuses not to have the fake exploit tested.
I have never asked for the fucking exploit, only independent verification that it works instead of the word of Ollie and Cos minions, which why I suggested Dropbear do the test, but only after Ollie herself posted how good Dropbears word was and how he could be the last word.
Only then when they saw Ollies big mouth had trapped them into being exposed did Rubbins start to try and smear Dropbear, Ollies own endorsement conveniently forgotten.
But the anyone who has dealt with Dropbear knows that he has more discretion to anyone else on the vault and that he has been keeping exploits and PMing new comers to the vault, advising them to not publicly post exploits or share with untested members since he joined the Vault.
Up until Rubbins saw how fucked they were, no one on the Vault has ever questioned Dropbear or his trustworthiness and exploit knowledge.
Which of course is why Rubbins tried to smear him and why I want him to do the test,
Because Dropbear, who incidentally was leaning Ollies way initially, would tell the truth when he found out the shard exploit was bullshit.
Since then Ollie and the other Bullshiteers have tried to distract in anyway they can including this whole lame, oh you just want our exploit excuse.
The problem with this excuse is that not only do I not want or need your fake exploit boys, Dropbear wouldnt give it to me anyway, because he is trustworthy, and he is more then a little pissed with me for dragging him into this after Ollie brought his name up.
SO? JUST MORE OLLIE AND COS BULLSHIT DESPERATION TO PREVENT THEIR FAKE EXPLOIT FROM BEING EXPOSED.
Please forgive me, but I told you so. I predicted long ago that Barcelot would create an intimidating, hostile, and demeaning environment. Now that he has, I'd like to express my thoughts on the matter. With this letter, I hope to build a world overflowing with compassion and tolerance. But first, I would like to make the following introductory remark: What we have been imparting to himor what he has been eliciting from usis a half-submerged, barely intended logic, contaminated by wishes and tendencies we prefer not to acknowledge.
Those of you who thought that Barcelot was finally going to leave us alone are in for a big surprise because Barcelot recently announced his plans to bar people from partaking in activities that cannot be monitored and controlled. A great many of us don't want him to ignore compromise and focus solely on his personal agenda. Still, we feel a prodigious pressure to smile, to be nice, and not to object to his contemptible calumnies. A free and open society should be able to tolerate a diversity of beliefs and practices, even when they are at odds with his repressive prognosesperhaps especially when they are at odds with his repressive prognoses. What I find most disturbing about Barcelot and his epigones is that they not only turn saps loose against us good citizens but do so without a pang of conscience. Let me express that same thought in slightly different terms: Barcelot constantly insists that you and I are objects for him to use then casually throw away and forget like old newsprint that's performed its duty catching bird droppings. But he contradicts himself when he says that the Earth is flat.
I apologize if the following points are hard to follow but they're quite relevant to the gist of my argument. First, education without action creates frustration, while action without education leads to despotism. And second, sometimes, what you don't know can hurt you. All of this means, of course, that if you'll allow me a minor dysphemism, Barcelot is certainly speaking through his hat when he says that the majority of salacious wallies work 25 hours a day, eight days a week and thus deserve occasionally to promote group-think attitudes over individual insights. Or, to phrase that a little more politely, Barcelot is not just lackadaisical. He is unbelievably, astronomically lackadaisical.
Barcelot clearly believes that a plausible excuse is a satisfactory substitute for performance. What kind of Humpty-Dumpty world is he living in? Well, I asked the question so I should answer it. Let me start by saying that my sources tell me that he intends to curry favor with louche lamebrains using a barrage of flattery, especially recognition of their value, their importance, their educational mission, and other tyrannical, lawless nonsense, in the near future. Not on my watch! I am therefore calling upon all good citizens to build a society in which people have a sense of permanence and stability, not chaos and uncertainty.
Barcelot is not as blowsy or sappy as you might think. He's more so. His proposed social programs are as predictable as sunrise. Whenever I reinforce notions of positive self-esteem, Barcelot's invariant response is to convince smarmy cads that there is absolutely nothing they can do to better their lot in life besides joining him. My wish to be polite notwithstanding, I must remark that as our society continues to unravel, more and more people will be grasping for straws, grasping for something to hold onto, grasping for something that promises to give them the sense of security and certainty that they so desperately need. These are the sorts of people Barcelot preys upon. Before he spews any more psychoanalytical drivel, let me assure him that he ignores the most basic ground rule of debate. In case you're not familiar with it, that rule is: attack the idea, not the person.
Given our society's new multicultural, multiracial, multiethnic paradigm, shouldn't we be thinking about how Barcelot is conversant only with those things in which his own interests are concerned? I'd also like to suggest that we think hard about how the erroneous things he says about me are sometimes entertaining, oftentimes sad, and frequently entirely pompous. If you doubt this, just ask around. He focuses on feelings rather than facts. Sure, Barcelot attempts to twist and distort facts to justify his feelings, but that just goes to show that he had previously claimed that he had no intention to substitute rumor and gossip for bona fide evidence. Of course, shortly thereafter, that's exactly what he did. Next, he denied that he would create a global workers plantation overseen by transnational corporations who have no more concern for the human rights of those who produce their products or services than Barcelot has for his apostles. We all know what happened then. Now, he would have us believe he'd never ever trample into the mud all that is fine and noble and beautiful. Will he? Go figure. My view is that some day, Barcelot's pudibund dupes may ask you why you think it's a good idea to fight scurrility and slander. If you're too stunned to answer immediately they'll answer for you, probably stating that Barcelot has achieved sainthood. You should therefore be prepared to tell these macabre desperados that if we tell it like it is then the sea of cannibalism, on which Barcelot so heavily relies, will begin to dry up.
Virtue is persecuted more by the wicked than it is loved by the good. This is not what I think; this is what I know. I additionally know that Barcelot would have us believe that his inclinations are the carriers of civilization and that without them history is silent, literature is dumb, science is crippled, and thought and speculation are at a standstill. The reality, in contrast, is that wherever you look, you'll see Barcelot enforcing intolerance in the name of tolerance. You'll see him suppressing freedom in the name of freedom. And you'll see him crushing diversity of opinion in the name of diversity.
There's no indication that Barcelot's sympathizers will ever give parents the means to protect their children. That said, let me continue. Barcelot is addicted to the feeling of power, to the idea of controlling people. Sadly, he has no real concern for the welfare or the destiny of the people he desires to lead.
Barcelot is well aware that he was rather wide of the mark when he said that his treatises are Holy Writ. If you don't believe me, see for yourself. All the deals Barcelot makes are strictly one-way. Barcelot gets all the rights, and the other party gets all the obligations.
Wouldn't it be wonderful if we lived in a world without the worst types of sneaky malingerers there are? As I often like to put it, my love for people necessitates that I lead us all toward a better, brighter future. Yes, I face opposition from Barcelot. However, this is not a reason to quit but to strive harder. Most members of our quick-fix, sugar-rush, attention-deficit society are too impatient to realize the importance of breaking away from the peloton and dealing with his vexatious, imprudent theatrics on a case-by-case basis. I wish only that a few more people could see that no one today believes that Barcelot is merely trying to make this world a better place in which to live. But what, you may ask, does any of that have to do with the theme of this letter, viz., that it ruffles my feathers that he wants to install a puppet government that pledges allegiance to his rebarbative gestapo? Well, I'm sure Barcelot would rather withhold information and disseminate half-truths and whole lies than answer that particular question. Unfortunately, I can already see the response to this letter. Someone, possibly Barcelot himself or one of his myrmidons, will write a lamebrained piece about how vitriolic I am. If that's the case, then so be it. What I just wrote sorely needed to be written.
Pages: 
TIMES UP! TOO BAD IT WAS JUST MORE OLLIE LIES (Read 19619 times)
