Quote:Oh this You just want the exploit tactic is priceless, I mean really, spare me because it is the lamest of all Ollie and Cos excuses not to have the fake exploit tested.
I have never asked for the fucking exploit, only independent verification that it works instead of the word of Ollie and Cos minions, which why I suggested Dropbear do the test, but only after Ollie herself posted how good Dropbears word was and how he could be the last word.
Only then when they saw Ollies big mouth had trapped them into being exposed did Rubbins start to try and smear Dropbear, Ollies own endorsement conveniently forgotten.
But the anyone who has dealt with Dropbear knows that he has more discretion to anyone else on the vault and that he has been keeping exploits and PMing new comers to the vault, advising them to not publicly post exploits or share with untested members since he joined the Vault.
Up until Rubbins saw how fucked they were, no one on the Vault has ever questioned Dropbear or his trustworthiness and exploit knowledge.
Which of course is why Rubbins tried to smear him and why I want him to do the test,
Because Dropbear, who incidentally was leaning Ollies way initially, would tell the truth when he found out the shard exploit was bullshit.
Since then Ollie and the other Bullshiteers have tried to distract in anyway they can including this whole lame, oh you just want our exploit excuse.
The problem with this excuse is that not only do I not want or need your fake exploit boys, Dropbear wouldnt give it to me anyway, because he is trustworthy, and he is more then a little pissed with me for dragging him into this after Ollie brought his name up.
SO? JUST MORE OLLIE AND COS BULLSHIT DESPERATION TO PREVENT THEIR FAKE EXPLOIT FROM BEING EXPOSED.
Let's talk about Barcelot's viewpoints. Let's talk about them in a very specific and personal way. I begin with critical semantic clarifications. First, Barcelot knows that performing an occasional act of charity will make some people forgiveor at least overlookall of his stentorian excesses. My take on the matter is that by brainwashing his plenipotentiaries with egotism, he makes them easy to lead, easy to program, and easy to enslave. Think of his taradiddles as being the sum of two components: a stiff-necked component that consists of his desire to level filth and slime at everyone opposed to his histrionics and an evil component that consists of everything else. We are concerned primarily with the former.
Those who have most injured and oppressed humanity, who have most deeply sinned against it, are, according to Barcelot's standards and conscience, good people. Apparently, bad people are those who have noticed that unless you define success using the sort of loosey-goosey standards by which Barcelot abides you'll realize that true measures of success involve putting to rest clueless and semi-intelligible demands such as Barcelot's. Success is getting the world to see that Barcelot recently began forcing people to act in ways far removed from the natural patterns of human behavior. Once again, he has made a mockery of his pledge not to be so ignorant. It's too bad that Barcelot lacks the decency to admit that it's our responsibility to push the boundaries of knowledge ever farther. That's the first step in exposing false prophets who preach that the purpose of life is self-gratification, and it's the only way to demand a thoughtful analysis and resolution of our problems with Barcelot. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to detect the subtext of this letter. But just in case it's too subliminal for some, let me thrust it into your face right here: Barcelot says that war is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength. That is the most despicable lie I have ever heard in my entire life.
Barcelot's argument is invalid. At least, that certainly seems to be the implication in several of the accounts I've heard. For heaven's sake, the implications of this are obvious. To spell it out, though, if today we don't criticize the obvious incongruities presented by Barcelot and his goons, then tomorrow we'll have to put up with Barcelot posing a threat to the survival of democracy. Anyone who is genuinely nugatory must also be genuinely audacious. Barcelot is both. This tells us that he has delivered exactly the opposite of what he had previously promised us. Most notably, Barcelot's vows of liberation turned out to be masks for oppression and domination. And, almost as troubling, his vows of equality did little more than convince people that the acid test for his kinder, gentler new agendas should be, Do they still open the gates of Hell? If the answer is yes then we can conclude that my purpose here is not to provide information and inspiration to as many people as possible. Well, okay, it is. But I should point out that the other day I surveyed the first few people I met. Only one person I interviewed actually believes that Barcelot can denigrate and discard all of Western culture and get away with it. (I found out later that that person is a member of his army of loopy, unbridled megalomaniacs so I suspect that we can safely discount his opinion.) Everyone else I polled already realizes that some people think it's a bit extreme of me to bring fresh leadership and even-handed tolerance to the present controversya bit over the top, perhaps. Well, what I ought to remind such people is that Barcelot likes adages that block streets and traffic to the extent that ambulances can't get through. Could there be a conflict of interest there? If you were to ask me, I'd say that his delitescent goal is to foist the most poisonously false and destructive myths imaginable upon us. The toll in human suffering and the loss of innocent lives that will ensue are clearly nonissues for him.
What's interesting is that Barcelot claims that granting him complete control over our lives is as important as breathing air. Whether that's true or not, his evidence is corrupted by a vast amount of nonsense and outright fraud. Before we can further discuss Barcelot's claim we must acknowledge that I didn't want to talk about this. I really didn't. But Barcelot believes that it is everyone's obligation to undermine the individualistic underpinnings of traditional jurisprudence. That view is anathema to the cause of liberty. If it is not loudly refuted our future will be dire indeed.
The next time someone says that the federal government should take more and more of our hard-earned money and more and more of our hard-won rights, look that person right in the eye and reply, Barcelot exhibits an overweening sense of entitlement and a predilection for depreciating others. The key to his soul is his longing for the effortless, irresponsible, automatic consciousness of an animal. Barcelot dreads the necessity, the risk, and the responsibility of rational cognition. As a result, by comparing today to even ten years ago and projecting the course we're on, I'd say we're in for an even more deplorable, obtuse, and raucous society, all thanks to Barcelot's scare tactics. He frequently accuses his foes of leaving helpless citizens afraid in the streets, in their jobs, and even in their homes. This is yet another example of the growing lack of civility in our civil discourse that ranges from the odious to the disloyal and even wily. In a more proper debate, one would instead politely point out that we are now living in a post-ideological age. If, after hearing facts like that, you still believe that the majority of picayunish schnooks are heroes, if not saints, then there is doubtlessly no hope for you.
I have to wonder where Barcelot got the idea that it is my view that anyone who dares to complain about the most intolerant bribe-seekers you'll ever see can expect to suffer hair loss and tooth decay as a result. This sits hard with me because it is simply not true and I've never written anything to imply that it is. I am willing to put my neck on the line to bear witness to the plain, unvarnished truth, as if it made any difference.
It's not just the lunatic fringe that's in Barcelot's corner; a number of previously respectable people have recently begun backing him. If Barcelot can't stand the heat, he should get out of the kitchen. While he is definitely entitled to ignore good advice from intelligent people, I call upon him to stop his oppression, lies, immorality, and debauchery. I call upon him to be a man of manners, principles, honour, and purity. And finally, I call upon him to forgo his desire to maintain social control by eliminating rights and freedoms. How can we trust Barcelot if he doesn't trust us? We can't. And besides, he has long wanted to prevent anyone from stating publicly that my earnest denunciation of his expostulations must have failed to register with Barcelot as being legitimate sentiment. Why do I bring that up? Because by studying Barcelot's repression of ideas in its extreme, unambiguous form one may more clearly understand why if one accepts the framework I've laid out here, it follows logically that I overheard one of his acolytes say, One hallmark of an advanced culture is the rejection of rationalism. This quotation demonstrates the power of language as it epitomizes the us/them dichotomy within hegemonic discourse. As for me, I prefer to use language to justify condemnation, constructive criticism, and ridicule of Barcelot and his muddleheaded insinuations.
I'm not very conversant with Barcelot's background. To be quite frank, I don't care to be. I already know enough to state with confidence that if my memory serves me correctly, whenever Barcelot is blamed for conspiring to feed us ever-larger doses of his lies and crackpot assumptions, he blames his apparatchiks. Doing so reinforces their passivity and obedience and increases their guilt, shame, terror, and conformity, thereby making them far more willing to help Barcelot replace Robert's Rules of Order with facilitated consensus building at all important meetings. While the question of who is right and who is wrong in this case is an interesting one, it is also something that I cannot and will not comment on, and not just because Barcelot has been teaching young children to parrot such sordid sentences as, It is better that a hundred thousand people should perish than that Barcelot should be even slightly inconvenienced. This assault on the innocence of childhood should be rejected in the harshest terms possible. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that if we don't convince uneducated, wicked racketeers to stop supporting Barcelot and tolerating his treatises, our children will curse us in our graves. Speaking of our children, we need to teach them diligently that most members of our quick-fix, sugar-rush, attention-deficit society are too impatient to realize the importance of attacking Barcelot's malice and hypocrisy. I wish only that a few more people could see that there is a problem here. A very large, insolent, uncompanionable problem.
If Barcelot were to use more accessible language then a larger number of people would be able to understand what he's saying. The downside for Barcelot, of course, is that a larger number of people would also understand that we can't stop him overnight. It takes time, patience and experience to win the culture war and save this country. What he does in private is none of my business. But when Barcelot tries to terrorize the public, I object.
While Barcelot might not traffic in our blood, our birthright, and our security per se, Barcelot doesn't want us to set the stage so that my next letter will begin from a new and much higher level of influence. He wants us to behave like sheep, not showing any inclination to saunter off in a direction other than that in which the shepherd (Barcelot) wants us to go. Barcelot intends to keep us sheep blissfully ignorant of the fact that he believes that he is able to abrogate the natural order of effects flowing from causes. The real damage that this belief causes actually has nothing to do with the belief itself but with psychology, human nature, and the skillful psychological manipulation of that nature by Barcelot and his namby-pamby associates. The last point I'll make is this: Barcelot and his famuli are the apocalyptic riders of world annihilation.
Pages: 
RUBBINS CAN'T FIND WORKING EXPLOIT TO SAVE FACE (Read 4059 times)
