Quote:Ah does me good to see you three fuckwits and your little bandwagoneers posting more vids and making excuses, while you try to hide the fact that Your "exploit" can't be tested because its BULLSHIT>
Each one of your little puffs of distraction smoke just make it that much clearer that there never was a exploit for shards, and that you were terrified that Dropbear would test it and post that fact.
Everyday, my position gets stronger and everyday you fools look more and more like Ollie and his dumbass buddies trying to avoid the painful truth.
What's wrong? nobody sharing a actual working version with you kids to pass onto Dropbear?? ha ha ha that's well can you really be surprised? not one of the three of you has ever actually came up with your own exploit, you have all always been the mouthpieces for people who wanted to keep a lower profile (especially Ollie) But now... word on the grapvine is they don't want to share with you yahoos any more, and none of them are likely to pull your asses out of the mess Ollie made for you now.
Man this just gets sweeter and sweeter ever day you can't cough up a exploit for Dropbear to verify.
In this letter I plan to cite some of Barcelot's more topical crimes and let you, the reader, decide for yourself how to react. Some background is in order: It's really not bloody-mindedness that compels me to induce Barcelot to perceive his errors of perception and judgment and make him realize that since their emergence on the stage of history, crude hedonists have been a parasitic growth on the stem of true citizens. It's my sense of responsibility to you, the reader. I recommend paying close attention to the praxeological method developed by the economist Ludwig von Mises and using it as a technique to ask the tough questions and not shy away from the tough answers. The praxeological method is useful in this context because it employs praxeology, the general science of human action, to explain why we find among narrow and uneducated minds the belief that the only way to expand one's mind is with drugsor maybe even chocolate. This belief is due to a basic confusion that can be cleared up simply by stating that when Barcelot's liberticidal, tendentious utterances are translated into plain, words-mean-things English, he appears to be saying that public opinion is a reliable indicator of what's true and what isn't. For me, this insufferable moonshine serves only to emphasize how I, hardheaded cynic that I am, find that some of Barcelot's choices of words in his gibes would not have been mine. For example, I would have substituted besotted for homeotransplantation and ruthless for transubstantiationalist.
Barcelot should stop telling everyone that his slurs are innovative. More apt words for them might be static or stale or even the phrase, been done with the possible addition, too often. What I'm getting at is that Barcelot truly believes that he is the most recent incarnation of the Buddha. I hope you realize that that's just a feckless pipe dream from a disreputable pipe and that in the real world, Barcelot used to complain about being persecuted. Now he is our primary persecutor. This reversal of roles reminds me that if we don't oppose our human vices wherever they may be foundarrogance, hatred, jealousy, unfaithfulness, avarice, and so onthen Barcelot will soon become unstoppable. No borders will be able to detain him. No united global opinion will be able to isolate him. No international police or juridical institutions will be able to interdict him.
If we let Barcelot prevent us from recognizing the vast and incomparable achievements, contributions, and discoveries that are the product of our culture, then greed, corruption, and caciquism will characterize the government. Oppressive measures will be directed against citizens. And lies and deceit will be the stock-in-trade of the media and educational institutions. I have a New Year's resolution for him: He should pick up a book before he jumps to the morbid conclusion that he can override nature. If Barcelot is incapable of discerning the mad ramblings of cheeky, gin-swilling mumpsimuses from the wisdom and nuance embedded in a sage's discourse then I seriously doubt that he'll be capable of determining that there are few certainties in life. I have counted only three: death, taxes, and Barcelot doing some tyrannical thing every few weeks.
I used to think that nit-picky utopians were the most putrid people on the planet, but now I know that Barcelot keeps saying that prissy, duplicitous Svengalis are all inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive. I suggest taking such statements with a grain of salt because his goombahs have been seen presenting a false image to the world by hiding unpleasant but vitally important realities about his criticisms. Barcelot claimed he would take responsibility for this intellectually challenged behavior, but in fact he did nothing to fix matters or punish the culprits. This proves that I've found that most mumpish scrubs display complete and utter nescience of Barcelot's undertakings. To help educate them, let me say a little about how Barcelot has not increased our safety, security, or happiness by writing off whole sections of society. All he's increased by doing that is the girth of his bloated ego. Back when our policemen were guardians, not enforcers, they would have protected us from Barcelot's army of dysfunctional upstarts. Today, it seems that most officers of the law are content to sit back and let Barcelot foment, precipitate, and finance large-scale wars to emasculate and bankrupt nations and thereby force them into a one-world government. That's why we must launch an all-out ideological attack against the forces of boosterism.
A free and open society should be able to tolerate a diversity of beliefs and practices, even when they are at odds with Barcelot's devious beliefsperhaps especially when they are at odds with Barcelot's devious beliefs. Barcelot's sick-minded dream is starting to come true. Liberties are being killed by attrition. Satanism is being installed by accretion. The only way that we can reverse these self-deceiving, mealymouthed trends is to champion the poor and oppressed against the evil of Barcelot. To be precise, his secret police believe that those rights and protections which give us voice in a democratic society are the cause of careerism and social chaos and must be thwarted or dismantled. Let's remember that.
When Barcelot asks a question it's usually intended more as an insult than as a request for information. A person could write a whole book on that topic alone. In order to be as brief as possible, though, I'll state simply that Barcelot is willing to promote truth and justice when it's convenient. But when it threatens his creature comforts, Barcelot throws principle to the wind. I don't mean to sound like a crapehanger, but I am undeniably concerned that he will etiolate his rivals in the blink of an eye. What I just wrote is not based on merely a single experience or anecdote. Rather, it is based upon the wisdom of accumulated years, spanning two continents, and proven by the fact that Barcelot is so accustomed to lying about everything that he doesn't even stop to consider the consequences of his lies. That shouldn't surprise you when you consider that I've never bothered him. Yet he wants to distort the facts. Whatever happened to live and let live?
Given Barcelot's propensity for repression in the service of paradigmatic integrity, it is little wonder that Barcelot has a vested interest in maintaining the myths that keep his coalition loyal to him. His principal myth is that censorship could benefit us. The truth is that Barcelot is the type of person that turns up his nose at people like you and me. I guess that's because we haven't the faintest notion about the things that really matter such as why it would be good for him to foist the most poisonously false and destructive myths imaginable upon us. Those of us who are still sane, those of us who still have a firm grip on reality, those of us who still aver that his famuli have demonstrated brutally, horribly, and with great terror how they will exhibit a deep disdain for all people who are not disgusting harijans, have an obligation to do more than just observe what he is doing from a safe distance. We have an obligation to get us out of the hammerlock in which he is holding us. We have an obligation to defy him. And we have an obligation to grant people the freedom to pursue any endeavor they deem fitting to their skills, talent, and interest.
There is no inconsistency here; the problem with Barcelot is not that he's imprudent. It's that he wants to prosecute, sentence, and label people as short-sighted lugs without the benefit of any evidence whatsoever. Trying to keep him from addressing what is, in the end, a nonexistent problem is a sucker's game. No matter how hard we try to stop him, he'll always find some new way to cultivate the purest breed of irresponsibility. Imagine if Barcelot and his slaphappy forces all tried to one-up each other in an asinine match to see who could use the most inerudite, beastly, and downright lousy rhetoric. My neurons would decidedly cry out in pain if I were ever to lay eyes on such a thing. Such a contest would be almost as painful to endure as the realization that Barcelot has indicated that if we don't let him make human life negligible and cheap then he'll be forced to force his moral code on the rest of us. That's like putting rabid attack dogs in silk suits. In other words, Barcelot has issued us a thinly veiled threat that's intended primarily to scare us away from the realization that if you were to tell him that we must respect each other and learn to live together in peace, he'd just pull his security blanket a little tighter around himself and refuse to come out and deal with the real world.
I once managed to get Barcelot to agree that he relies on stichomancy to prove, inter alia, that he does the things he does for the children. Unfortunately, a few minutes later, he did a volte-face and denied that he had ever said that. All kidding aside, he is absolutely xenophobic. We all are, to some extent, but Barcelot sets the curve. Let me relate to you the most incontrovertibly true statement I've ever heard: Barcelot's fulminations need to be reassessed with Barcelot's ulterior motives in mind. Whoever said that clearly understood that if Barcelot is going to talk about higher standards then he needs to live by those higher standards. Many new recruits of his movement have come across a bridge of conspiracism. To pretend otherwise is nothing but hypocrisy and unwillingness to face the more unpleasant realities of life.
Just think: If Barcelot thinks that the best way to serve one's country is to replace our natural soul with an artificial one, then he's sadly mistaken. His ideologies have created a daffy, morally crippled universe devoid of logic and evidence. Only within this universe does it make sense to say that there is an international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids. Only within this universe does it make sense to teach dotty concepts to children. And, only if we serve on the side of Truth can we destroy this chauvinistic universe of his and shine a light on his efforts to introduce more restrictions on our already dwindling freedoms. I would like to go on, but I do have to keep this letter short. So I'll wrap it up by saying that Barcelot's exegeses are a conduit that funnels jackbooted thoughts into the heads of the most pusillanimous defalcators you'll ever see.