H8Tank wrote on Aug 27^th, 2014 at 7:43pm:


moar caps, moar whining

1. it's a pornstar

2. ddocrack faps to hitler

Vendui wrote on Aug 27^th, 2014 at 7:57pm:


There are many spleeny, base-minded cumber-grounds who want to nail people to trees. One—Ollie's Signature—is so argumentative, it deserves special mention. I will start this discussion by arguing that I see myself as a link in the endless chain of generations, with an inescapable responsibility to summon up the courage to carry out the famous French admonition, écrasez l'infâme!, against Ollie's Signature's beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically reasoned arguments). Then, I will present evidence that if Ollie's Signature were paying attention—which it would seem it is not, as I've already gone over this—it'd see that moving increasingly towards the establishment of a totalitarian Earth is a mug's game. The only reason Ollie's Signature does things like that is because it seizes every opportunity to spawn delusions of adventurism's resplendence. I cannot believe this colossal clownishness. Any sane person knows that I clearly have no appetite for censoring by caricature and preempting discussion by stereotype. Many moralistic brutes, however, do. That's why I want them all to read this letter and others like it and discover for themselves that Ollie's Signature doesn't want us to lead a jacquerie against it. It wants us to behave like sheep, not showing any inclination to saunter off in a direction other than that in which the shepherd (Ollie's Signature) wants us to go. Ollie's Signature intends to keep us sheep blissfully ignorant of the fact that at no time in the past did the most nasty grizzlers I've ever seen shamble through the streets of cities, demanding rights they imagine some supernatural power has bestowed upon them.

I and Ollie's Signature part company when it comes to the issue of favoritism. It feels that people don't mind having their communities turned into war zones while I assert that some people apparently believe that if we don't bother it, it won't bother us. The fallacy of that belief is that our desires and its are not merely different; they are opposed in mortal enmity. Ollie's Signature wants to promote bumptious ideologies such as moral relativism. We, in contrast, want to alert people that I cannot promise not to be angry at it. I do promise, however, to try to keep my anger under control, to keep it from leading me—as it leads Ollie's Signature—to prevent us from recognizing the vast and incomparable achievements, contributions, and discoveries that are the product of our culture. The facts are in: Ollie's Signature derives sadistic pleasure in the misfortune of others.

Skoodge wrote on Aug 28^th, 2014 at 4:39am:


He discvered the copy-paste-function of RMB. Once he learns the shortcuts on the keyboard, he'll probably paste whole books.

Skoodge wrote on Aug 28^th, 2014 at 4:39am:

After weeks of observation and reflection, I have finally reached the conclusion that no value, no belief, and no personal need or desire can be placed higher than the aspiration to encourage our spirits to soar. Whoa! Don't stampede for the exits! I promise I'll get to the main topic of this letter, Sir Skoodge's mutinous, self-pitying calumnies, in just a few sentences. I simply feel it's important first to provide some additional context by mentioning that it's clear enough that Skoodge knew of his backers' plans to violate values so important to our sense of community. However, Skoodge contented himself with a private, pro forma call for restraint—in other words, a green light. This call may even have encouraged his backers' actions by obscuring the fact that contrary to my personal preferences, I'm thinking about what's best for all of us. My conclusion is that what's best for all of us is for me to reach out for things with permanence, things beyond wealth and comfort and pleasure, things that have real meaning. As a parting thought, remember that Sir Skoodge's traducements are not on the up and up.

Skoodge wrote on Aug 28^th, 2014 at 4:39am:


Didacticism Club has had its say, and this is mine. As is customary for a letter of this sort, I will now offer up paper and ink anent the phylogeny of Didacticism Club's eccentric paroxysms in order to make the point that what I just wrote is not based on merely a single experience or anecdote. Rather, it is based upon the wisdom of accumulated years, spanning two continents, and proven by the fact that I challenge Didacticism Club to point out any text in this letter that proposes that its foes are aligned with very dark and malevolent fourth-dimensional aliens known as Draconians. It isn't there. There's neither a hint nor a suggestion of such a thing. Now that you've heard what I've had to say, I want you to think about it. And I want you to join me and acknowledge that most censorious agitators think, “credo, quia absurdum” when they hear Didacticism Club say that sin is good for the soul.

DDOcrackhead wrote on Aug 28^th, 2014 at 7:52am:


I wanted to respond to Right Mouse Button earlier, but I was so busy, I simply did not have the time. Nevertheless, what I need to say is so important, I knew I simply had to allocate a few minutes to write a brief letter on the subject. For those of you who like to eat dessert before soup, my conclusion at the end of this letter is going to be that Right Mouse Button believes that it is everyone's obligation to create a beachhead for organized sensationalism. That view is anathema to the cause of liberty. If it is not loudly refuted our future will be dire indeed. Each of these issues is central to the officialism debate. And that's all I have to say.

It is obnoxious, if it is not kidde porn they are trying to make it as close to it as possible, what a mob of pedos.

Makes me want to throw up.

Vault admin? please do something about this.

Let's say I didn't Adblocked anything faster yet.
I could probably explain boobs and asses, this shit not so much.
But hey if that gets you off, suit yourself.

FakeStrake wrote on Aug 29^th, 2014 at 6:55pm:


And it all comes into focus.

Well that's interesting - either Factor and Barcsalot are twins - or it's a sockpuppet account.

With only 70 posts to his name it's easy to view his last 50 - the 'factor' account was used to spew a bunch of shit about melicat.

The account (if you go look at the post history) uses the same language and mannerisms that barcsalot does - including stuff like saying

Quote:



Now I'm actually scared - this is someone who has not only been trolling the vault - based on evidence has actually been on a crusade and picking members to 'righteously persecute' - using multiple accounts to back himself up.

General fuckary is the norm here - and good lord knows we have our share of sycophants and sociopaths - but at least they aren't fucking batshit insane.

Quote:


Hey Riddling.  Hows the ex-wife?