Quote:

Well, the short hair thing has sources. It's an educated guess, and it deserves credit for making sense. The long hair thing is ... backed up by the vision of the "mystic" who pulled it out of their ass. So yeah. Guesses.

Quote:

It seems like you're just trying to caution us against citing Wikipedia as a source. Given the mouth-breathers who post here, fair enough. But any grad student should know what a wonderful starting point for your research it can be.

Revaulting wrote on Mar 15^th, 2015 at 2:37am:


Ehh, that's not really my experience, I've never noticed any grad student that I've ever collaborated with who used Wikipedia to augment their research. Why the hell would that even cross your mind when it's a given that being part of an institution grants access to an endless amount of journals through databases. Not to even mention the symposiums that are held by leaders in various fields doing presentations - that's actually the exciting and interesting part of doing it.

Just two days ago I had to write a proposal grant-style for a research program in my med school for the summer, for which I used nothing but new issues of journals arriving at the lab every week, Academic Search Complete, Pubmed, and science direct databases to get the caliber of info I needed to actually come with a testable hypothesis that hasn't been tested yet (to the best of my knowledge). Wikipedia won't suffice - it's a factoid repository in my view.


Sigh...here come the "liar" edits.

Quote:


Yes. Because you keep lying for attention.

5 Foot Step wrote on Mar 16^th, 2015 at 5:04am:

Same. It's like some retards cannot check source. Because clicking numbers after a sentence is too hard.

5 Foot Step wrote on Mar 16^th, 2015 at 5:04am:

Uh, doesn't that just it free for corporate and special interest group lobbying?

Quote:


Come on man, you expect us to believe that?

Quote:

Fair enough. The more specialized your research, the less useful Wikipedia will be. I'll amend my statement to "any undergrad college student." The point is still that Wikipedia is both more useful and more reliable than what you seemed to give it credit for. I'm not going to fault it, or any encyclopedia, for not going into depth.

Quote:


No, it's just a little to close to the bone for you. All of us that had to put up with you for the last two years, or should I say all of us that had to put up with your exploding ego have seen you do this again and again. 

Careful lad, a few of us know just how much of what you have posted here is utter fabrication, especially the real world claims, you may want to pretend but it doesn't change the fact that you have posted so many whoppers on this site that we can't bear to play with you now.

That's why we never respond or raid with you, you're a embarrassment, a lying whore for attention.

Have a little pride in the things that you really have done, stop making all this fantasy crap up, it's not healthy and clearly no one on this site gives a shit.

No, but the comparison has been made many times. They are the same ilk though, heaving, whining, attention obsessed drama queens who will say anything, both pathetically willing to make up any lie no matter how far removed from reality just for attention.

Seriously stupid, sick, liars.

We already covered that, it turns out it was pot calling pot black.

God this makes me laugh myself horse, you're still the pathetic attention whore I see thaz, pretty sure that will never change.  Here is a little fact for you bumpy, you hopped into this thread recently at #82 at no prompting or nudging from me or anyone else. You jumped in to spout more lies and bullshit of entirely you own volition. My favorite part is that you did it after you once again ran off to hide and lick your wounds for several days after we all trounced you.....which was exactly what I and others said you would do. So predictable.

I know that is hard for someone as self-centered as you to see, but you're a total joke now, and no lies can fix what you did to make yourself a laughingstock. Forget? gosh don't you remember what you told us "any attention is good attention" remember that? did you think we would forget that you said something as fucked up and neurotic as that? something that showed just how much of a whore for attention you are? something that said just how desperate you are for people to talk about you?

Think about that bumpy, you willing told everyone that "any attention is good attention", you posted that, not us, so how seriously fucked up and delusional do you or anyone who would use that as a defense for being a attention whore look? pretty fucked up and delusional.

So go ahead and try to deny it, and whatever new lies you want to make up, because all that will happen is that you will get your head handed to you again, and then you will run off and hide yet again, before crawling back for more abuse... because any attention is good attention to someone as desperate and broken as you right bumpy?

God, you are just so stupid, so childish, so simple minded... such a below average thinker and pale human being.

Bumpy makes Firefootstep look like a brain surgeon. Just imagine the brain dead children.

I want a donut