What you just did is applying a flat 150% increased damage buff, that's exactly the same mistake Erky made. 

How much does it hurt being your brain?

(Note: It might actually work either way ingame, I mean it's Turbine, but by the pretty unambigous description my math should be correct)

Well, we saw how well Turbine does math, with that special on Half Elf's...

Edit: What I am referring to: http://www.ddovault.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1419572709

Melee (or Ranged) Power: 150
SA Damage: 15d6 (15*3.5 avg) = 52.5

150MP/RP * 150 Scaling = 22500 or 2.25CoEff (move 4 decimal places over on 22500 to make 2.25)

52.5*2.25 = 118 SA damage after scaling.

Am I missing something here?

Hag Master wrote on Apr 29^th, 2015 at 1:13am:


Not quite - it is an extra 118 damage on average, not 118 total.

Melee Power of 150 leads to a damage multiplier of x2.5 (MP==0 is x1 damage, don't forget).

Therefore the sneak attack damage (effective MP==2.25, and therefore damage x 3.25) should be 170.

Unless Turbine maths comes into play, natch - then all bets are off.

Hag Master wrote on Apr 29^th, 2015 at 4:50am:

Chi is right, and that is exactly based off the same formula i used as noted above.

Maybe try visiting elemantary school once more, but this time you should do it right off the bat fagmaster .

They didn't fuck the implementation up, it works exactly as advertised.

Tested:

6d6+15 Sneak (avg 36)
60 MP

Ingame sneak numbers in Impossible Demands: 60,74,74, 55,81,68,68,79,62,60,79,72,76,72,77,70, avg: 70,4

By my formula the expected value is:
36* (1+ (60 *(150/100) / 100)) = 68.4

Multiplying by the Erky method would result in:
36 * 1.6 * 1.5 = 86.4

Computing HarHar's method would result in:
36* (60*150 / 10000) = 32.4

There's no turbine math at work here, results are within expectation range. Big words and the lack of ability to follow through when it comes to basic math are just cute.

Tincan wrote on Apr 29^th, 2015 at 12:49pm:


My math would be:

6 * 3.5 = 21+15 = 36
1.60*150=1.9000
36*1.9 = 68.4

That's correct, in your previous formula you missed

Quote:


the red part.

harharharhar wrote on Apr 29^th, 2015 at 1:20pm:




(16*3.5 +18) * (1+(176 * (150./100) / 100.)) * 2.8 = 754

Still extremely impressive.

Chi wrote on Apr 29^th, 2015 at 1:59pm:


Keep dreaming lightweight, must be difficult for you here, not having little stroke-posters on speed-dial. 

You're agreeing with a idiot like Tincunt, pretty desperate. But at least Tin will figure out the math if we give him enough clues and a week or two of time to think. You? useless.

Ask your admin for a simple python distribution, that can be easily veiled as an innocent work-relevant tool for many jobs.

And FagMastiff, I'm always there for a little flame, but in this thread the desperation award of useless participation goes straight to you, you're trying way too hard.

What a grand revelation that would be after I basically admitted it in my third post here or so. I don't care, I'm here to be able to talk some shit without resorting to backhanded insults or gnawing teeth when I think the situation demands it. Flame my MB posts all you want, maybe you are more clever than the_dumb when it comes to pulling one where I actually

a) look like a whiny bitch
b) look like an imbecile
c) look like a retard
d) am wrong

Those certainly exist, for your pleasure only. That's my story, what's yours?