So, what have we learned here?

1) Some people will fall for any bait, no matter how obvious.

2) Those same people will work their asses off to prove a point that is, in fact, pointless.

3) The idiots who think they're clever will out themselves given half-a chance.

4) I can set up any series of hoops, knowing full well and in all confidence, that someone's going to jump right through them

5) Victory is not something you "claim" so much as "exhibit."

6) What did he out, like 3 more socks?  That boy Remi's never going to make the big bucks, his chosen pastime is pattently unprofitable.

7) The "backfire" effect of other board members falling for the sock I was outting was TRULY hilarious; those clowns went silent real quick after that...except to celebrate...the outting...of the sock they all fell for: exquisiteness achieved.

8) I am the man.

9) No seriously, I am.

10) You got nothing.

I almost forgot the most important one:

11) Every one who got owned in this thread has no means of redress; my jimmy is beyond your ability to rustle.

I'm not from the Bahamas.

A name change is a chone, since when?

[] wrote on Nov 13^th, 2015 at 3:54pm:



love the softballs.  keep 'em coming.

Quote:


ha ha ha.  that's the one thing we can thank this wannabe for:  Draken.

Yobai wrote on Nov 13^th, 2015 at 4:46pm:

I thought choning was deleting account?

[] wrote on Nov 13^th, 2015 at 5:18pm:


It's one way for sure, but a surprisingly large number of people never figure out how to do it that way. Instead when  they start getting really man-handled by the vault they tend to either stop logging on entirely, or end up trying to change  names to escape the abuse.

Sometimes after changing names they even go as far as deleting their old posts, or in some cases pretending to be different people with different vocab or posting style, some even make secondary accounts in the name of their old account to try and muddy the water and avoid abuse. It never works, instead just leads to more intense mocking and abuse as both Notharharhar and Firefoot can attest. They both had thought they were going to slip the shame but ended up actually intensifying the perception of how out of their depth they were in the Vault. Firefoot and Notharharhar changed names half a dozen times each and looked stupider and more desperate  after each change.

Either way in the end, it's all just shades of gray on the Chone-scale of shame, so avoid doing any of them and you will be fine.

gawker wrote on Nov 13^th, 2015 at 5:26pm:


which is what has happened here.  nothing special whatsoever.  just the same fail cycle experienced by every other wanna be.

I see the religious persona is cracking.  you gonna chone that one too and go back to your racist roots?  lol.

persona...

cracking...

you're such a rube!

Strakeln wrote on Nov 13^th, 2015 at 7:02pm:



Oh gosh, not a chance of this.

Notharharhar actually does have working knowledge of the game and insight into several of the elite-end build practices.

From his very first posts, and his comments on the DDOchat P4P has shown a enormous deficit on current and recent past game knowledge and application. Any posts he has been bullied into finally making about a build have shown knowledge and assumptions based on data that is 2-3 years out of date. And caused him no end of embarrassment, because the builds he has tried to suggest were just pure gimpgarbage, I mean really really bad ideas, some of the worst I've seen here. 

So while they did both chone the same way by trying to use different names and personas, P4P is not Notharharhar.