Flav wrote on Dec 8
th, 2015 at 4:51pm:
Well they do, for obvious reasons :
- It's faster
- It's easier
- it needs less coordination
- it can be shortmanned
- By the time it takes to complete an EE, you can do 3 EN runs, with less ressources spent, less stress, less drama and more loot chances.
( not even counting the 3 completion towards 20th )
- you can even invite a Pug or two and tell him to stay in a corner to fatten the loot chances.
For Quests, specially those with tiered loot, people will go EE, because that's how to get the best chances at getting the best loot, but for raid EN is the fast way to loot.
And that new system won't change anything, it's just going to annoy people because it's more grinding to get to the '20th list'.
Speed of completion will always win over difficulty as long as there's Timer Bypasses.
But until the new bypass timers become readily available, there is a greater cost to 4 EN raid runs vs. 1 EE raid run. Or 2 EN vs. 1 EH.
I personally think that the sweet spot will settle in at EH. EH is twice as fast to 1250 as EN, but not twice as hard, in any raid I've been in. EE, although 4 times as fast as EN, is probably too much risk vs. reward.
If we were still in the world with 100's of bypass timers in inventory, then yes, EN runs would still be common place for their ease and speed. But, in a world where they are more of a premium, you will see more EH runs.