Lelouch wrote on May 24
th, 2016 at 9:40pm:
I just dont get, if i say that there are builds out there /i can name couple specific bear based builds, couple tree build ideas that i have now and several other ideas that are melle and could survivive without most of the gear that was mentioned and execute their purpose while sloting lgs for set bonuses, why are you against that?
If you play 1 sided builds that turbine wants you to play (pure ranger, pure rogue, pure barb, now pure fighter), why are you actually going against me who is trying to find builds that go against turbines policy?
Its as if you are supporting turdbine.
I have no history with you, so maybe this will show you a neutral take on the exchange. You're acting like you've got some secret builds you aren't willing to share, when Turbine is well aware of (and has been for literally years) the wolf and other unarmed fighting issues. They aren't exploits, Turbine has come out and said that they are not even though you'll find plenty of people on the ddoboards who will call it cheating/exploiting/whatever until they are red faced and raving and still not infracted.
So by being coy and saying crap like:
Quote:Lets say, there are builds out there that are melle and can afford to drop most of the gear listed here while still being effective enough to zerg content no matter the difficulty
You are only making yourself look bad. If you think your build can really do without half the crap that Asheras listed, then explain why. Failing to do so doesn't make you look like you have some secret build that no one else does, it makes you look like you're a prick who thinks he can win a discussion by declaring "Durk's got a secret!"
And going "Gee, guys! I thought we were all against Turbine together!" is another prick move in an argument.