Flav wrote on Oct 24^th, 2016 at 5:18am:


It doesn't take understanding large words to parse this statement.  You cay that 'if' Turbine's servers were migrated to an AT&T that things would be 'great.'

Even ignoring the 4 months of horrible customer experiences due to the lag brought about by the last server migration, because we're all going to assume that they now know how to run a VM, exactly what would suddenly become 'great' just because they moved their servers again?

Lag goes away?  It's pretty much guaranteed that customer wide lag is not network based but code based, so no improvements can be expected there.  And really, they have managed to get back to their pre-migration level of intermittent lag, or perhaps they've even improved on it a bit via some code tweaks, again when looked at on a customer base level and not an individual level.