Bishop wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2020 at 9:08pm:


FIFY.

Also, no one cares.

Shadehater wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2020 at 10:02pm:



Ok, legally-speaking, you're an idiot.

Pandemic has the law suit at the bottom of the barrel in priorities both for attorney and for opportunity for myself.  I'm not going to pass on half a million dollars in solar panels just to get this paperwork filed faster for an injunction to discovery.  It's not my problem individuals here decided to open themselves to libel claims and perpetuate it with disclosure of personal information and emails that otherwise would be relatively unknown.  I'm not a public figure and didn't post anything to help point the individuals here towards any information or false claims they've made against me.

As you can see, no one has been attacking my military service, accusing me of stolen valor, or falsifying statements regarding my wife lately.  Also, those were not active discussions until certain individuals here re-started without prompting by myself.  Libel Defamation has a 1 year statutory from discovery in most states (including NY) so we have plenty of time regarding filing against DDOVAULT.COM and then filing a Discovery Motion.  I already have the paperwork from his domain name registry.

Regarding again sniffing around or claiming other things such as fraud, since there's no basis and it's incorrect, we can lump that into the libel claims.

You are not very good at discussing law based on the above rambling quotation. 

Also, show me the money.

Allow me illustrate what it's like dancing around in the Vault while the trolls cry Kistilan took money fraudulently to the bank.

Shadehater wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2020 at 10:45pm:


Thanks.  I posted my Bronze Star Medal with redacted info awhile back when the libel defamation regarding stolen valor was posted here and incited further with cross-posts encouraging users to report me to the DoD for stolen valor.

As for the paperwork, I'm gonna say it again -- it's not filed because it's not a priority, so the whole Bishop asking about subpoena thing is a lot like asking Elon Musk when he's going to send cookies from Mars to Arizona.

Well, first he has to make it to Mars.  Then he has to send cookies and eventually they will make it to Arizona.  Elon has stated he intends to go to Mars, but he certainly hasn't GONE to Mars yet.

So apply that accordingly.

Kistilan wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2020 at 11:10pm:

Did you attach the Combat "V" device to the ribbon/medal?

If so, were you authorized to do so?

If you did and you weren't authorized, that's the textbook definition of "stolen valor."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bronze_Star_Medal

Kistilan wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2020 at 10:15pm:

So your claim here is in two parts:

1) That Bishop opened himself up to libel claims because he repeated information that you disclosed on the internet, and

2) That I opened myself up to libel for sharing emails you sent to vault.troll@gmail.com.



I wish you luck, twerp.

Kistilan wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2020 at 10:15pm:

Not that this is in any way relevant - whether or not you posted clues toward your online presence really has nothing to do with libel - but it's completely false. As pointed out several times, you decided to use your fairly unique first name as your userid, and a google search of your userid brings anyone to a litany of embarrassing shit you've posted.

Again, not that it matters, but here you are, making shit up, again.

Kistilan wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2020 at 10:15pm:

Oh, wow, you are very impressive! You must have scared everyone back into their shells!

Oh, wait, it turns out July 28 was not that long ago:
Bishop wrote on Jul 28^th, 2020 at 8:34pm:

Imagine that, Kistilan caught in yet another lie. SHOCKER.

Kistilan wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2020 at 10:15pm:



There you go again. You make "I did a whois lookup" sound so impressive. I remember when you first looked this up and were dismayed to find out that my name is not enom.org. I'm sure everyone is very impressed and scared. You're so internet-savvy. OH NO GUYS HE DID A WHOIS LOOKUP!

Strake wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2020 at 12:22pm:


So, I never disclosed I beat my wife.  That's a lie.

I also never disclosed I executed a stolen valor move, that's a lie.

Strake wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2020 at 12:22pm:


You definitely facilitated him by doing so. Yes.  Rather than striking down libel claims about me, you let them stay posted as the publisher, hence libel facilitation.

Bishop wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2020 at 4:29pm:


You're one of the finest god damn idiots the Internet has produced in 4 decades.

I *never* beat my wife, and therefore I couldn't have disclosed that I had ever done so as that would be a lie.

Strake wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2020 at 12:22pm:


Honestly, if my name was Kistilan I'd probably be all kinds of fucked in the head as well.

His parents must've really hated his guts before he was even born. Roflmao!

Kistilan wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2020 at 4:27pm:


I’m pretty sure not moderating the text is a requirement of 230 protection thus Strake would be a fool to remove and curate the content, unless required to by injunction or if he found other materials as offensive in good faith, that would make him liable.  This I’m 95+% sure of as the law currently reads and has been applied.

Again layman’s read/not a lawyer.

Yes I know from experience that emails/PMs are only considered private and privileged between specific entities with privacy rules such as doctors, or lawyers with their patient/client. Sometimes this applies if it is agreed to by both parties and stated in the communication as well.

I know this from my profession.  Of course a court can in most instances decide differently, but rarely do excerpt in cases of or involving conspiracy.

That is blatantly untrue.  A platforms owner is under no such obligation to remove content especially if not given a take-down notice and even then good luck proving its involvement as well as it/his culpability

I believe this applies in this instance as well with Strakes assertion that a good lawyer will laugh at his involvement
http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/publishing-statements-and-content-others

Again could be wrong/not a lawyer

And with this I am done with this thread I think unless pulled back in.

noamineo wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2020 at 7:12pm:


Well, taking the option to not (and by extension even incite by his own actions the continuation of those statements) is like the NYT continuing to print a libel defamation or slanderous reporting in an interview without ever making a redaction/correction statement. 

So it's also very important for the publisher to know what the hell their forum is actually stating in regards to defamation via libel words.  This is why DDOWiki deleted Bishop's numerous attempts to stick that on my DDOWiki.com/pages/Kistilan link.   They literally cited it was libelious in nature and needed to be removed. 

This is something Strakeln has not done in this forum.  I'm not sure why he allows libel defamation of an individual to be published, but he has continued to do so.

Kistilan wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2020 at 6:29pm:


I'm gonna sue GoFundMe for allowing people to beg for money.

How can they allow this?