Kistilan wrote on Jun 30^th, 2020 at 2:31pm:

You don't have to, dummy.

For example, look at some of the recent exchanges between Gunga and I. He spent a lot of time trying to insult my intelligence. It got no response from me, so he stopped. I spent a lot of time calling him a short, bald, fat, ugly hobbit with a Napoleon complex. It got no response from him, so I stopped. See how this works?

Now let's take a look at you. Someone trolls you with bullshit, and you respond forever. To the point that you start issuing empty threats about suing people. That's called feeding the trolls. And feeding them well, I might add.

Kistilan wrote on Jun 30^th, 2020 at 2:31pm:

Not by you, that's for sure.

Kistilan wrote on Jun 30^th, 2020 at 2:31pm:

No you haven't.

Kistilan wrote on Jun 30^th, 2020 at 2:31pm:

And then you decided to feed a troll and wondered why he kept coming back for more.

Kistilan wrote on Jun 30^th, 2020 at 2:31pm:

I'm not sure where you get the idea that sending me emails filled with laughably empty threats entitles you to some kind of privacy. It doesn't. Allow me refer you to the registration agreement:

Quote:


Kistilan wrote on Jun 30^th, 2020 at 2:31pm:

You could also shut this vector off too by just shutting the fuck up, but you don't.

If you don't feel it's that important, why should I?

Strake wrote on Jun 30^th, 2020 at 3:06pm:


Not yet, nope.

Strake wrote on Jun 30^th, 2020 at 3:06pm:

Conjecture and Hearsay.  Prove your claim.

Strake wrote on Jun 30^th, 2020 at 3:06pm:


I beg your pardon, I've not.  And you've failed to accurately depict this.  Please clearly illustrate me throwing unnecessary shade and punches to rebuttal false claims, but that were clearly out of line and akin to fraud or libel in nature with a clear persistent nature that shows I was indeed making a claim regarding assassinating a person's character and quality and maintaining this delusion?   I've offered what you might call jocular and jovial crude rebuttals, but I have not made personal attacks repeatedly on the same criteria without warrant or evidence, nor provocation.

Strake wrote on Jun 30^th, 2020 at 3:06pm:


When was your policy put into effect?  When were the emails dated?

Strake wrote on Jun 30^th, 2020 at 3:06pm:


Probably because you incited it further, so you're not clumped in and feel no remorse. I wanted to get that clearly on the books.

And I'm barely replying to Bishop, you realize, or any of his multiple personalities on this forum. 

For someone with Republican ideology, you apparently don't care about the sanctity of someone's marriage, nor do you care about someone's military service being misrepresented as fraudulent by another user with no provocation.


I think you enjoy this.  That's sad.

Oh dear god, this is akin to seeing a one-armed peg-leg get in a shoving match with a Longshoreman who just want's to get past him on the dock to get a beer.   

The one are might explain the delay in finishing that subpoena paperwork as well. 

If you would like copies of whatever proof you could get it in discovery, but then you would actually have to file a suit instead of just threatening one endlessly, you wife beating, valour stealing buffoon.

It took me less than a minute to check for myself: https://web.archive.org/web/20101022134657/http://www.ddovault.com:80/cgi-bin/ya...

It was there on 22nd Oct 2010. Not that it matters, just I was curious.

Kistilan wrote on Jul 6^th, 2020 at 3:06pm:

Wait, what?

Nobody handed you a shovel, but you just keep digging deeper and deeper.

I wasn't scared before, but I'm terrified now that you've told me your attorney is a washed-up military dweeb who can't properly fix vehicles, farm, rent houses, install a fucking pole, run a business, or even apply for government freebies. I'm sure he lawyers with the best of them.

Kistilan wrote on Jul 6^th, 2020 at 5:24pm:

OF COURSE it will happen. Just like the last time that you made the same exact threat and totally followed through with it. You sure showed me!

Strake wrote on Jul 6^th, 2020 at 6:05pm:


Lightning rarely strikes twice, so there's that probability going for you.

So... I just read this train wreck. It boggles the mind.

I'm too sympathetic/empathetic to post my feels. But, I'll say this:

Kist, the troll food you provide is next-level thanksgiving feast. Either you don't understand the internet OR you want the attention. Bishop is a very low-level troll that was on life support until you showed up, nursed him back to health, and now you're daily giving him 3 squares and dessert.

This isn't complicated at all. Don't respond to him. Ever. That's the secret. It's not a secret, and it works. Without fail. But you can't help yourself.. It's either fascinating in a tragic way, or it's suspicious.

Head-Meat wrote on Jul 8^th, 2020 at 11:21am:

Yes.

Kistilan wrote on Jul 8^th, 2020 at 1:15pm:


I'll only address this one more time. After that, you're acting stupidly or stubbornly to continue.

Bishop is an alcoholic. You are handing him shots of whiskey. No, it's not your fault he's an addict. You didn't make him that way. But, it IS your fault to give him drinks. You can't fully blame him for being drunk after that. It's a shared responsibility.

If you want to actually sue him, fine. But, there's not a single reason to continue to talk about it. We all get it. You were offended. If it was 1800, you'd dual at dawn.

If you continue to feed him, part of the problem lies with you. We all know that. I'm hoping you can learn it.

Bishop wrote on Jul 8^th, 2020 at 4:55pm:



Well, I mean it with love and sympathy. Takes one to know one. I've been far too engaged in this silly game and place lately--as you have pointed out...

Strake wrote on Jul 8^th, 2020 at 5:05pm:



Being too patient/gracious is one of my faults.