newalchemist wrote on Oct 9
th, 2020 at 10:32pm:
You guys, are dum dum
Imagine the police, pull someone over for speeding, and instead of fining them and making a big story about it they say “oh it looks like your licence doesn’t work” and say nothing else.
SSG is dum dum, but they would rather make people fear exploiting rather than just shadow ban. SSG doesn’t run private prisons so they have no incentive to continue giving people the idea they can get away with exploiting.
I am... not really sure what this post is supposed to say? D'you wanna try again?
You open by calling us "dum dum". Ok, sure, solid opening, this is the vault; you either grow a thick skin or GTFO.
Then go into a pourly-phrased analogy... still on brand...
Now you're calling SSG dum dum, but pointing out that they don't run private prisons? (which is patently untrue, EVERYONE knows this. Its on their god damn website, they make video games and run a private for-profit work camp in Laos. Read the fucking wiki, n00b). You try to say they would rather make people fear exploiting rather than shadow ban, but they ARE shadow-banning; which gives everyone who didn't find out about the shadow banning a very good incentive to keep on exploiting: they got away with it.
So we have:
*Poor sentence structure
*Vague analogy
*An incorrect point disproven by it's own statement.
Yup. That is a Vault post.